Reservists: Civilian Careers at Risk

Reservists Face Rocky Return In Job Market (CBS)…Lesley Stahl, Nov 2, 2008.

“60 Minutes” report on National Guard and Reserve troops returning home from active duty to “find themselves demoted or penalized or out of a job completely.” Includes interview with Asst. Secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs Thomas Hall.

With over 50 of his workers deployed right now, Miller says the company is spending about $4,000 a piece to train their replacements, and as much as $100,000 if a worker has to be relocated from another state. … The private employers cannot supplement, cannot support the full cost of defending this nation on our balance books.

I had one senior VP of HR tell me that if `I had three candidates for a senior position in the company, and one of them mentioned they’re in the Guard and Reserve,’ he would only have two candidates left. And I said, `You know that’s illegal.’ His response was, `I can always find a reason why not to hire somebody.’

Israel: Missile Defense

Who Is For Missile Defense?, (Washington Times)…James T. Hackett, Nov 2, 2008

The effort to defend against Iran’s missiles took a new turn in late September when Washington delivered an X-band radar manned by 120 U.S. personnel to the first permanent U.S. military base in Israel.

The radar sent to Israel is the same as the high-powered transportable model now operating in northern Japan. It is ideal for detecting short- and medium-range missiles such as Iran’s Scuds that can reach U.S. bases in Iraq and its Shahab-3 that threatens Israel. The advantage over Israel’s Green Pine radar is that the X-band radar can track missiles from launch, providing extra minutes to intercept. A Shahab-3 flies about 9 minutes from Iran to Israel, so a gain of several minutes is invaluable.

Disruptive Technology: Ray Gun

Fighting With Photons Unattributed. November 1, 2008
(Economist)…Unattributed

…The first serious battlefield ray gun is now being deployed. And the next generation, now in the laboratory, is coming soon.

The deployed ray gun (or “directed-energy weapon”, in the tedious jargon that military men seem compelled to use to describe technology) is known as Zeus.

If Zeus works, it will make soldiers’ lives noticeably safer. But what would really make a difference would be the ability to destroy incoming artillery rounds. The Laser Area Defence System, LADS, being developed by Raytheon, is intended to do just that—blowing incoming shells and small rockets apart with laser beams. The targets are tracked by radar and (if they are rockets) by infrared sensors. When they come within range, they are zapped.

If it works, LADS will be a disruptive technology in more senses than one.

Special Forces and Smart Intelligence

Covert Forces Trumpet Successes In War On Terrorr, (Washington Times)…Claude Salhani, Oct 31, 2008.

…Covert action remains a critical instrument in the war on terror. And it is thanks to a number of covert operations that the United States, according to a high-ranking Pentagon official, has made headway in the war on terrorism.

Fighting terrorism necessitates a two-pronged approach – covert action by special forces and smart intelligence.

By the end of this decade or probably early in the next decade, special operations forces will essentially be twice as large as they were at the beginning of the decade. The numbers of special forces troops will increase from the current levels of about 15,000 to somewhere around 64,000. The budget for the Special Operations Command will more than double in the next year.

This is the largest growth in special operations force history. What the United States is building is the special operations component of the global war on terrorism for the future, according to Mr. Vickers.

At the moment, the United States maintains special operations forces in some 60 countries. The vast majority – 80 percent – of those right now are concentrated in the greater Middle East or the United States Central Command area of responsibility; the bulk of those of course in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is one of the reasons why the United States is expanding its force significantly.

U.S. Miltary Power: "Still No. 1"

Still No. 1 (Washington Post)…Robert Kagan, October 30, 2008; Page A23

…Meanwhile, American military power is unmatched. While the Chinese and Russian militaries are both growing, America’s is growing, too, and continues to outpace them technologically. Russian and Chinese power is growing relative to their neighbors and their regions, which will pose strategic problems, but that is because American allies, especially in Europe, have systematically neglected their defenses.

America’s image is certainly damaged, as measured by global polls, but the practical effects of this are far from clear.

Phillipines: Successful war against Islamic terrorists

The Philippines: America’s Other War On Terrorism(McClatchy Newspapers (mcclatchydc.com))…Warren P. Strobel, McClatchy Newspapers, Oct 22, 2008.

…On a Southeast Asian front that’s vital yet largely unfamiliar to most Americans, some 500 U.S. Special Operations Forces and their Filipino counterparts have been fighting a different, unconventional — and seemingly successful — war against Islamic terrorist groups with links to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaida.

The lessons of this relatively low-budget effort could be invaluable as the next U.S. president assumes the task of fighting Islamic extremism with a federal Treasury drained by the nation’s economic woes and the Army and Marine Corps strained by the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Terrorism: Consensus on Next Steps

New Consensus On Terrorism
(Washington Times)…John McLaughlin, Oct 6, 2008.  One of the major tasks for our next president is repairing the frayed consensus on how to deal with terrorism.

John McLaughlin is a senior fellow at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and served as deputy director and acting director of Central Intelligence from 2000-2004.

Accountability: Defense Spending – DFAS

Crisis Shows Efficiency Need, Pentagon’s Jonas Says, By Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg News, September 26, 2008

The U.S. financial crisis may lead to lower defense budgets and more public demand for accountability over spending, Pentagon Comptroller Tina Jonas said.

“Any crisis of this nature is going to affect — must affect — other federal spending,” Jonas, the Defense Department’s top money official since July 2004, said today in an interview on her last day in office.

Congress is weighing a $700 billion rescue package to help the economy as lenders cope with a credit crunch triggered by declining home prices and bad loans. Any analysis that suggests defense budgets will escape impact is too sanguine, she said.

“The broader commitment to national security is there to keep our forces ready and capable, but I think it’s yet to be seen what the potential impact is on future defense budgets,” she said of the crisis. “You cannot look at defense by itself. It is a subset of our macro financial picture.”

Jonas has focused on trying to make accounting more transparent at the Pentagon, which for years was unable to have its books successfully audited. Now about a third of its $3.4 trillion in assets and liabilities can pass a federally approved audit, a percentage that she said will reach two-thirds in 2009. Military spending under the Bush administration has increased almost 43 percent since 2000 when adjusted for inflation.

“The spotlight will be on how the government manages its money and that will include us” in the military, she said.

Jonas said the Pentagon’s books should live up to the standards of Sarbanes-Oxley, the 2002 law that tightened scrutiny of financial results after corporate accounting scandals. “We should be accountable just like any other private organization,” she said.

Making two-thirds of the Pentagon’s books able to be audited by next year is “substantial and serious progress,” she said. “The remaining third will come with the next administration.”

A clean audit for the Pentagon means “we know where our money is and where it is going in way that is done on an accrual basis and not a cash basis,” Jonas said. “That means if I write a vendor a check, that transaction can be traced — all the pieces needed to document the correctness of the transaction are validated according to generally accepted accounting standards.”

Jonas, 48, is a graduate of Arizona State University and Georgetown University. She was sworn in as comptroller in July 2004 after serving as the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s chief financial officer and earlier as Pentagon deputy undersecretary for financial management. She also worked for four years at the Office of Management and Budget.

Jonas reports to work Sept. 29 as director of operations, planning and analysis for United Technologies Corp.’s Sikorsky Aircraft unit in Stratford, Connecticut, said company spokesman Paul Jackson.

Russia, U.S. Missile Defense

Russian Bombers Could Be Deployed To Cuba
(Washington Post)…Peter Finn, July 22, 2008
Pg. 10

Russian bombers capable of carrying nuclear weapons could be deployed to Cuba in response to U.S. plans to install a missile defense system in Eastern Europe, a Russian newspaper reported Monday, citing an unnamed senior Russian air force official.

"While they are deploying the missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, our strategic bombers will already be landing in Cuba," Izvestia quoted the source as saying.

The United States says it wants to deploy tracking radar in the Czech Republic and 10 missile interceptors in Poland as a defensive measure against missiles that might be fired from countries such as Iran. U.S. officials insist that the system presents no threat to Russia, which, they say, could easily overwhelm it by launching multiple missiles at the same time.