Managing costs: U.S. Weapons Programs

Rising U.S. Weapon Costs May Force Cuts, Jonas Says
(Bloomberg.com)…Tony Capaccio, Bloomberg News, July 7, 2008

The next president will likely be forced to cut or delay U.S. weapons programs because their cost has almost doubled since 2000 to a projected $1.7 trillion, according to Pentagon Comptroller Tina Jonas.

“Some of this is just a matter of our own discipline — not changing the bells and whistles once we get going on something,”

Iraq: Positive trends – troop reductions

Gates Optimistic That Iraq Troop Cutbacks Will Continue, (Yahoo.com)…Agence France-Presse Defense Secretary Robert Gates expressed optimism Tuesday that US troop cutbacks will continue in Iraq, saying the transition of control to Iraqi security forces was going well.

Iraq Wants Withdrawal Timetable In U.S. Pact
(Washington Post)…Ernesto Londono and Dan Eggen. Iraq’s national security adviser said Tuesday that his government would not sign an agreement governing the future role of U.S. troops in Iraq unless it includes a timetable for their withdrawal.

U.S. National Debt: Interest payments

Just who owns the U.S. national debt?

And as the cost of paying Social Security and Medicare benefits continues to rise, the national debt monster is going to be even harder to tame.

So far, the consequences of all this are hard to put your finger on. As Warren Buffett pointed out last week in his widely-read annual letter to shareholders (pdf file, page 16), a big reason we can fund our budget and trade deficits is that the U.S. is still an incredibly wealthy country with lots of stock, bonds, real estate and companies to sell. And we got that way because of the hard work of generations that come before us.

And American investors and companies also have investments in foreign countries. But as Buffett noted, last year marked the first time since 1915 that the net balance of this investment turned negative.

“Foreigners now earn more on their U.S. investments than we do on our investments abroad,” Buffett wrote to shareholders “In effect, we’ve used up our bank account and turned to our credit card. And, like everyone who gets in hock, the U.S. will now experience ‘reverse compounding’ as we pay ever-increasing amounts of interest on interest.”

The wealth gap between the U.S. and other countries — even those with huge, rapidly growing economies like China — is still big. That means our credit with the rest of the world should be good for years — if not decades — to come. But no matter how rich you are, borrowing on top of borrowing is not a great long-term financial plan.

“I believe that at some point in the future, U.S. workers and voters will find this annual ‘tribute’ (of interest payment on the debt) so onerous that there will be a severe political backlash,” Buffett wrote. “How that will play out in markets is impossible to predict – but to expect a ‘soft landing’ seems like wishful thinking.”

Observations (highlighted) on the debt from Warren Buffett caught my attention.

Leadership, Power, Love

ARTICLE: Six Sigma and more: David Schwinn ruminates about power. PQ Systems, July 2008 eline.

Thought provoking article on three types of power:

Power over — probably the most common application that results in compliance and not committment.

Power to  — expand power by delegating the decision-making power of  subordinates while intensively coaching the subordinates in the thinking process that the manager uses.

Power with — is power of love that results in  performance far beyond what is generally expected   

Love in context of Quality Leadership.¼/p>

Army: Biometrics

Biometrics: The Army as Executive Agent for the Department of Defense

Biometrics are measurable physical and behavioral characteristics that enable the establishment and verification of an individual’s identity. Once established, a biometric identity can be used to regulate individual access to DOD services and resources or to deny a criminal or adversary the ability to hide his true identity by stripping away anonymity with swift, accurate, and definitive identity verification.

Biometrics are key to intelligence and security efforts in the war on terrorism. The ability to establish an individual’s identity with certainty and link the individual to past aliases or activities gives our Soldiers a decisive edge in fighting the war on terrorism and aiding other U.S. government organizations. In addition, biometrics add a layer of security and a method of identity verification when accessing DOD and federal government spaces by further automating the identification process and increasing speed of entry.

Declaring War

Put War Powers Back Where They Belong
(New York Times)…James A. Baker III and Warren Christopher, July 8, 2008

THE most agonizing decision we make as a nation is whether to go to war.

A bipartisan group that we led, the National War Powers Commission, has unanimously concluded after a year of study that the law purporting to govern the decision to engage in war — the 1973 War Powers Resolution — should be replaced by a new law

Partnership for Iraq

The Wrong Partnership For Iraq, (Washington Post)…Bill Delahunt and Rosa DeLauro, July 8, 2008, Pg. 15

The June 15 editorial ” A Partnership For Iraq” criticized Democrats in Congress for opposing the proposed long-term military agreement between the United States and Iraq that would replace the U.N. mandate under which U.S. forces are fighting. The editorial called the agreement a way of “countering Iran’s attempt to dominate the Middle East.” We have examined this issue for many months and believe that The Post’s position is badly misguided.

…We have proposed an alternative that would serve our interests and those of the Iraqis far better: extending the U.N. mandate in Iraq for six months, as has been done before, so that the new president and Congress can work with Iraq’s leaders to determine the next agreement.

It is time for everyone to slow down. We should extend the U.N. mandate for a short period to maintain the status quo and ultimately turn this issue over to the next president and Congress, who must implement any agreement. Rather than dictating the terms of our long-term relationship with Iraq, such a policy would allow us to work with Iraqis to craft an agreement that includes the carefully coordinated withdrawal of U.S. combat forces that majorities in both countries support. Doing so would also solidify the type of sustainable partnership that the people of the United States and Iraq need and deserve.

 

FCS: Missiles in a box

‘Missiles In A Box’ Test Is Successful, (Arizona Daily Star (Tucson))…Arizona Daily Star, 07.08.2008

Tucson-based Raytheon Missile Systems said Monday that NetFires LLC, its joint venture with Lockheed Martin, has successfully launched another Non Line-of-Sight-Launch System Precision Attack Missile.

The NLOS-LS, formerly called NetFires and informally dubbed “missiles in a box,” is a system of self-contained missiles and launch containers that can be adapted to various military platforms.

In 2004, NetFires was awardeda a six-year, $1.1 billion contract to develop the system as part of the U.S. Army’s Future Combat System.

Iran … likelihood of attack

A U.S. Attack On Iran? Not Coming Soon
(Christian Science Monitor)…Peter Grier, July 8, 2008
Pg. 1

A preemptive US attack on Iranian nuclear facilities may be unlikely anytime soon. But that does not mean it is off the table forever. And Israel – worried about the possibility of a hostile, nuclear-armed regional neighbor – may have its own timetable for possible military action.

The likelihood of Israel bombing Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities is not zero, but it is not as high as many experts seem to think, Mr. Pollack said at the CSIS seminar.